|
An Interview with
Ed Coloracci
 |
In a recent issue of TRiBE, our own super-sleuth,
Cece, shared with us her enthusiastic
review of a concert by Doors tribute band "Break On Through".
I contacted vocalist Ed Coloracci (by email) for an interview, after
reading his post in the Doors fan email discussion group "Neon Groves"
*(see footnote), in which he described one of his biggest thrills: Meeting
Robby Krieger and singing in a live performance of Robby's band. |
Ed has a hectic life, to say the least, but took time out to phone me from
New York. I enjoyed the conversation immensely, finding him articulate
highly intelligent, and just plain charming. He strikes me as a respectful
fan, gifted in his own right, who has no desire to "steal" Jim Morrison's
soul from us or exploit the indelible niche The Doors have carved in music
history.
"Break On Through" consists of a tightly-knit, energy charged nucleus
of talented musicians, who bring down the house wherever they appear. I
hope to catch a live show myself someday soon. Do visit the band's
website for backround info, updates, and tour schedules.
I followed up my chat with Ed by preparing a list of specific questions,
to which he replied by email. In his own words, he lends his impressions
about his life and eventual evolution of the band...
#1 In our phone conversation, you barely
got a chance to touch on your transformation from Wall Street to "Love
Street", so to speak. Did I hear you correctly to say you'd been a stockbroker,
unaware of your ability to sing until shortly before the band was formed?
Please tell us how and when Break On Through came to be..
Ed:
I worked on Wall St. in 1989-1990, right after graduating from college.I
ran a training program for a brokerage house. You can safely assume that
it was not for me. I did meet some interesting people though, who I still
keep in contact with. The section of new York that I grew up in essentially
had, for the most part, 3 career choices. Either you were a NYC cop, or
NYC fireman, or you went into finance. Since I was enrolled in college
when most of the people I knew were beginning their careers, I chose intially
the latter.
Anyway, after a few years, my Wall St. experience, and a car accident
(that changed my life in a lot of ways), I began to look for something
creative. I thought I might be able to sing the Doors, for some reason.
I was a "HUGE" fan since my teens and I knew all the words. I decided to
put an ad in a local entertainment mag. "Looking for musicians to start
a Doors tribute band". The idea certainly was not new. There had been several
doors bands out there for years. I had seen several, and there always seemed
to be something missing. The element of theatre and chance was just not
there.
So the ad went in, and I recieved one call. The call came from (at the
time)a 16 year old drummer named Chris. Since he was 16, I did not give
him much thought, but he kept on calling (persistent, you had to love the
kid.) He basically had a keyboardist who was in a Bob Marley tribute band
and had never played a Doors song, and a guitarist whose passion lay in
top 40. All this, plus a singer who had never sung a note. Not exactly
a formula for success. When we finally met, it was obvious that we had
a "universal mind" intially as to what we wanted to be. We would focus
on the live/bootleg material and studio cuts that the Doors rarely did
(i.e. "Who Scared You?", "We Could Be So Good Together", etc.) We also
wanted to be as theatrical as possible. Our show should be like "American
Prayer" or a movie for the ears.It clicked early on.
#2 You also mentioned the band employs improvisation
in the re-creation of a Doors concert experience. I find this aspect very
appealing, as no two Doors concerts were identical. Please elaborate..
Ed:
Improvisation is 100% what Break On Through is about. Not just improvisation
in the musical sense, but audience as well. Since this is a tribute band,
the audience has to make the songs come alive. They have to buy into it.
We always, in the genesis of the band, were playing "The End". We never
rehearsed it, other than the chord changes in the beginning, but that was
the magic of it for us. I would put the Holy Sha, awake, away in India,
etc in it if thats what I felt the crowd wanted (or really if the band
was in the mood). The band would always go into a "latin bullshit #2" type
of thing. We did this for awhile until we felt it became part of the "act".
These are the moments on stage I really enjoy. When Nobody's quite sure
how the song is going to go. The trick with playing a song that everybody
knows is not where you go with it, but how do we get back.. ("Something
wrong,something not quite right.")
#3 You said you're a writer, as well. Speakin'
my lingo, there! I'm interested in the direction of your literary pursuits.
What are your favorite "reads".. and "writes"?
Ed:
I love reading historical biographies. Winston Churchill, Stephen Biko
bios were some of my recent favorites. Poetry, I just finished Ferlinghetti's
"Coney Island". Unfortunately, I do not read as much as I used to-- free
time. I do enjoy reading the New York Times everyday though. As far as
writing goes, I do not write any "songs" per se. It's poetry that I have
been writing for years, along with observations of people and America,
in journal I wrote in while on tour. I write more comedy for a few scripts
that I keep, more than anything else. That's what I am currently writing.
#4 Any details you want to share on when
you first met Robby Krieger and your continuing association are extremely
welcome. Must have been a stellar high to sing with his band.*S*
Ed:
I actually spoke to Waylon Kreiger first. I book bands as well, and
I was trying to help his band (the OK band) to book on tour. We hooked
up in NY when he was backing up his father, and he introduced us. Robby
is a great guy and extremely talented musician. He was everything you thought
he would be. Shy, yet not necessarily afraid to speak his mind. It was
great performing with him then, and then again last year, during the following
tour of new York. I think he's coming back, I'm not sure. I speak to Dale
Alexander, the drummer/keyboardist occasionally, and he was not sure when
Robby was coming out again.
#5 Most difficult question of all: How do
you personally perceive the phenomenon of The Doors and the 60s era, in
general, from your standpoint in time? Those of us who lived it are fascinated
by the varied opinions of successive generations.
Ed:
I think what seperates the Doors from a lot of bands is the universal
themes in their music. Psychology, the human condition, love, death, religion,
etc. These are topics that are timeless. Obviously, Morrison had alot to
do with it. Some people say it was his looks. Some say it was his lifestyle.
Its probably a combination of both. I think he had tremendous understanding
of the psychology of pop culture. Lyrically you can really see it. He was
a quote machine. From a performer standpoint, when he was on, he was amazing.
Sex, crooning, screaming, poetry, psychosis-drama in its full effect. Personally
I was drawn to this. Someone who puts forth the full range of emotions
in a full two hour performance.
I always used to say that the doors were the worlds most human band.
As far as the doors as musicians, they were collectively a very strong
unit. I was always drawn to Ray's keyboard playing. The Vox continental
organ is the greatest sound. The greatest pure organ sound you can get.
Robby's tones were so pure. When I was a teenager, I used to say that the
doors were the only band in which you could hear each individual note on
each song. I still believe that today. The Group dynamics of the doors
were an attribute that set them apart. Neil Young said recently that the
Doors as "instrumentalists were amazing. They could go anywhere in the
song."
*NOTE: You may subscribe to Neon Groves, run by avid Doors fan
and memorobilia collector, Bill Tikellis, by visiting the home
page. |